Estimated reading time: 5 minutes
Message From Ontario Director
As we approach the first anniversary of the May 1, 2020 OIC (Order in Council), firearms owners are still wondering what the future of legal firearm ownership will be in Canada. I don’t blame them; the situation has been changing on a weekly basis. We started with 1500 models prohibited and many additional firearms were prohibited after the OIC was announced. The cherry on top of the cake was when the Liberal government introduced C21 onto the table to enable aspects of that OiC, and to ban and restrict additional firearms. What was really disgusting was that they targeted the paintball community as well as, Airsoft, Pellet gun, and BB gun owners.
Canada’s National Firearms Association responded to the Liberal government’s May 1 firearms prohibition by designing an appropriate legal response. We located a strong client in Cassy Premack (then Parker) who, with her husband, owns K.K.S. Tactical Supplies in Prince George, BC. Cassy’s business will be greatly diminished or even destroyed as her main source of income was based on the sale and support of several different types of firearms that are now prohibited. Bill C21 will further damage Mrs. Premack’s business.
Lead lawyer Solomon Friedman launched her federal court case on May 21 2020 as case number T-569-20. Cassy and the NFA are challenging the May 1 OIC to serve justice for Canadian firearms owners. This challenge is backed and funded fully by Canada’s National Firearms Association. There have been many donations received to support the matter.
The NFA has also applied for intervenor status in the court case with our lawyer Guy Lavergne. We believe this is the best route to take to obtain the best chance of success. The gun lobby vs Canada would not gain the affection of the Court, but a compelling client with a huge portion of her family’s income to lose surely will. Cassy is not alone – there are many firearms businesses across Canada affected by this situation who are having to make hard choices about the viability of their business, and having to consider laying off employees and even closing their doors.
I know I have had enough! The battle has barely started yet as we wait for the federal government to give us a court date. We have been preparing since we first heard this Order In Council was being crafted several months before being introduced.
The NFA is pushing hard with social media, radio, and tv ads to better educate people on the truth about the false Liberal propaganda that the gun grabbers have been using to build support. The truth is that this is nothing more than a run at Canadas overvetted and excessively controlled firearms owners with an expensive programme that will not accomplish anything. They have targeted us because they are lazy – gun owners are easier to pick off than the claimed target of reducing criminal violence. Bill Blair has repeated a number of times that he believes the firearms owners will comply. What does this mean in the short term? Many firearms owners are going to lose their property. They are being penalized for a crime that they have not committed unless you think the way MP Pam Damoff thinks as she has said “ You are a law abiding firearms owner,,, until you are not”. Many misinformed Canada’s will think that they are now safe and there will never be a crime involving a firearm again.
In the long term, Canada’s will come to find out that we the firearms community were never the problem. All the gun control measures the Trudeau government has taken did nothing but waste taxpayers money. It was a make feel safe project designed to cover a civil disarmament agenda. Guns will still continue to be smuggled into Canada and criminals will still be able to acquire them. People who wish to carry out evil deeds will always find a way.
Can You Make A Difference
The answer is yes you can!
There is power in numbers – help us help you by joining Canada’s National Firearms Association give us a greater voice in Ottawa.
Donate to the Cassy Premack vs Canada court challenge to help fund the fight for all firearms owners.
Share our message. It has been increasingly hard to broadcast our message out as the anti-firearms media restricts our access.
We’re seeing ideologically motivated, violent extremists who are using online platforms to propagate and advocate for hatred and violence against women, against religious minorities, anti-sematic and Islamophobic and hateful speech and advocating violence, and we can use these red flag laws because, I tell you many of those extremists, not every person who’s in the gun lobby is an extremist, but everybody who’s extremist is in the gun lobbyBill Blair
How Canada’s National Firearms Association Responds
Nothing in Bill Blairs comments describes me. I do not advocate for violence and hatred. To label me as an extremist is right out insulting.Jordan Vandenhoff
Estimated reading time: 5 minutes
Firearms Control Dumpster Fire
As each day passes Canada is looking a lot more like New Zealand and the dumpster fire of gun control measures they have implemented. Currently IBM Canada is working on a multi billion dollar buyback program for firearms owners to get “fair market value” for the firearms that the government has deemed to be a danger to civil society. You know, the ones Justin Trudeau claims were designed to kill the most amount of people in the least amount of time
At the same time The Ministry of Environment Saskatchewan is looking into purchasing 147 AR style rifles. Why would conservation officers need these firearms that are, according to Justin Trudeau, built only for the purpose of committing mass murder? Do they plan on killing the most amount of moose in the shortest amount of time ?
Source: CBC News
Canada & New Zealand
When it comes to gun control these two people share the same views. If you look at what has happened in New Zealand and what has started to happen here in Canada on May 1 2020, it is a tall sign what Canadian firearm arms owners can expect.
Canada has had registration of restricted and prohibited firearms for a very long time now which gives Trudeau and the gun grabbers a bit of an advantage over New Zealand.
New Zealand has seen lots of civil disobedience with their new gun reform. Canada’s National Firearms Association, the leading firearms organization in Canada says we will be seeing the same thing happen here as well.
Bill Blair also known as Trudeau’s lap dog is constantly pushing forward to civil disarmament in Canada by making false claims and misleading the public, playing on fear. When asked questions on how this will solve the gang and crime problem and stop the flow of illegal firearms coming into Canada he avoids the question and says “This government is looking to make Canadians safer by removing the military style assault weapons, the ones that don’t belong in a civil society” his famous line. Everything the government has done will not solve the problem. Canadian PAL holders go through a criminal background check once a day, which is referred to as “continuous eligibility”. They have to follow already extremely strict storage and transport laws, so what does this liberal government hope to accomplish by attacking those who commit none of the crimes?
Toy guns have also been targeted through Bill C-21, which seeks to “end the proliferation, importation, export or sale of those replica firearms that exactly resemble regulated firearms and discharge projectiles at a dangerous velocity.” With the banning of replica paintball guns and airsoft guns, retailers may go out of business. “If the bill passes in its current state, this business will shut down. I will lose my job. The owner will lose everything. Our five employees will all lose their jobs,” said Ziming Wan, manager of BlackBlitz Airsoft in Waterloo. Again we must ask — what’s the purpose? Hint: there isn’t any, it’s just more feel-good theatrics from the government that has no real purpose.
Even if we assented to the fact that the buyback program was based on legitimate concerns, which it is certainly not, will the government equitably compensate Canadians? From precedence, I’m going to say no. Australia and New Zealand both had buyback programs in 1996 and 2019, respectively. Gun owners consequently were not awarded proper compensation, At the same time, a massive data breach in NZ revealed the details of gun owners’ names, addresses and firearms.